Welcome to Public Speaking & Debate Week! This week is about learning how to use your voice with confidence, clarity, and purpose. We’ll practice speaking in front of others, organizing our thoughts, and defending ideas with evidence instead of emotion. You’ll learn how debates work, how to ask strong questions, how to think on your feet, and how to speak in a way that makes people listen. By the end of the week, you won’t just be better speakers, you’ll be better thinkers, better listeners, and more confident explaining what you believe and why it matters.
ð️ MONDAY — Public Speaking Foundations
This week, we’re learning how to speak so people listen. Not to win arguments, not to be louder than others, but to explain ideas clearly and confidently. Public speaking is a skill. Nobody is born good at it. It’s something you build.
“When have you seen someone speak and really hold attention?”
“What made them interesting?”
Learning Goals
- Understand why public speaking matters
- Learn basic delivery skills
- Practice speaking without fear
- Eye contact - Looking at people, not at the floor.
- Voice (volume, pace, pauses) - Speaking clearly, not rushing.
- Body language - Standing like you believe what you’re saying.
- Clear structure - Beginning, middle, end.
- Informative
- Persuasive
- Entertaining
- Argumentative (debate)
- Teach the concept of speaker nerves = energy, not fear.
- Feeling nervous doesn’t mean you’re bad at speaking. It means your brain knows something important is happening. Our goal this week isn’t no nerves. It’s speaking anyway.
- ð Emotion Read: Read the same sentence in different emotions (angry, excited, bored). "We cannot change the decision that was made today."
- ðŠ Mirror Practice: Practice posture and gestures.
- Reflection: What's one strength you already have going for you? What's one goal you have for this week?
- Course: "Public Speaking 101"
- Blog: National Speech & Debate Association
ð️ TUESDAY — Public Forum Debate (Case Building Day)
Debate is not yelling. Debate is organized disagreement. Today, you will argue a position you may or may not agree with, and that’s a skill. 4 Things All Great Listeners Know
Resolution
Resolved: The benefits of generative artificial intelligence in education outweigh the harms.
That means: Do the benefits of generative artificial intelligence in education outweigh the harms?
Teaching Script: “A debate resolution is a yes-or-no question. One side must prove why it should happen. The other proves why it should not.”
- What they believe
- Why it matters
- Why its better than the other side
ð§ą Debate Basics (Kid-Friendly Breakdown)
- Affirmative (yes): “We should do this because it solves problems.”
- Negative (no): “We should not do this because it causes harm or doesn’t work.”
Step 1: Learn the Topic (Together)
1. Key Definitions & Frameworks
- Generative Artificial Intelligence: AI systems (like ChatGPT, Claude, or Midjourney) capable of creating new text, code, images, or audio based on user prompts.
- Education: This spans K-12 schooling, higher education (universities), and alternative learning environments.
- Outweigh: This requires you to establish a weighing mechanism (or framework). Usually, this is based on utilitarianism (the greatest good for the greatest number of students) or educational equity (how it impacts disadvantaged groups).
2. Affirmative Arguments (The Benefits)
The Affirmative (Pro) side argues that generative AI enhances the educational experience, democratizes access, and prepares students for the future.
- Hyper-Personalized Tutoring: AI can act as a 24/7, low-cost personal tutor. It adapts to a student's individual learning pace, breaks down complex topics, and provides instant feedback, which is especially valuable in underfunded school districts.
- Teacher Empowerment & Efficiency: Teachers spend hours on administrative tasks, lesson planning, and grading. AI can automate these tasks, allowing educators to dedicate more face-to-face time to mentoring students and managing classrooms.
- Bridging Accessibility Gaps: For students with learning disabilities, non-native English speakers, or neurodivergent learners, AI can instantly translate text, simplify language, or convert text to speech, leveling the academic playing field.
- Future-Proofing Skills: AI is reshaping the global workforce. Integrating it into schools teaches students vital prompt-engineering, digital literacy, and critical thinking skills required for future careers.
3. Negative Arguments (The Harms)
The Negative (Con) side argues that AI compromises academic integrity, deepens social inequalities, and harms student development.
- Erosion of Critical Thinking & Plagiarism: Over-reliance on AI can lead to "cognitive offloading," where students use AI to write essays and solve math problems instead of learning how to think critically, research, and formulate arguments themselves.
- The Digital and Algorithmic Divide: While wealthy students use premium, advanced AI tools, students in low-income schools may lack stable internet or basic access. Furthermore, AI models can contain inherent algorithmic biases that reinforce historical inequities or provide inaccurate information ("hallucinations").
- Loss of Human Connection: Education is fundamentally social. Replacing human feedback and peer collaboration with machine interfaces can increase student isolation and diminish the emotional intelligence gained from human mentorship.
- Data Privacy & Surveillance: Educational AI tools collect massive amounts of student data, including writing styles, learning speeds, and personal interactions. This raises severe data privacy concerns regarding how tech corporations store and monetize student data.
4. Strategic Weighing for Public Forum
To win a PF round on this topic, you cannot just list impacts—you must compare them. Use these three lenses to weigh your arguments in the final speeches:
- Magnitude: Which impact affects more students? (e.g., Does the benefit of worldwide personalized tutoring affect more people than the harm of cheating?)
- Probability: Which outcome is more likely to happen? (e.g., Is total data privacy collapse guaranteed, or is it a manageable risk?)
- Reversibility: Can the harms be fixed? (e.g., Pro can argue that plagiarism can be mitigated by changing how teachers test students, making the harm reversible).
Step 2: Coin Flip & Team Assignment
- Flip coin for Affirmative / Negative
- Assign:
- Speaker 1
- Speaker 2
Case Template (Use for BOTH sides)
1. Introduction
- Restate the resolution
- Clearly say your position
2. Argument 1
- Claim - what you're saying
- Evidence (quote/fact) - proves it's true
- Impact (why it matters, why anyone should care)
3. Argument 2
- Claim
- Evidence (quote/fact)
- Impact (why it matters)
4. Conclusion
- Why your side is better overall
Prep Time Rule:⏱️ Each team gets 3 total minutes of prep time during the debate.
Model an example.
- “What does this prove?”
- “Why does that matter?”
- “Can you say this more clearly?”
ð️ WEDNESDAY — Public Forum Debate Day
Morning: Finish Writing
- Polish cases
- Practice timing
- Review crossfire questions
Teaching Script for Crossfire: Crossfire isn’t arguing. It’s asking smart questions that expose weak points. They should do one of three things: clarify, expose a weakness, force a choice.
- “Where is your evidence for that?”
- “Does that apply in all cases, or just some?”
- “Which matters more: safety or independence?”
ð§ Debate Flow
- Constructive – Team A (4 min)
- Constructive – Team B (4 min)
- Crossfire (3 min)
- Rebuttals (4 min each)
- Crossfire (3 min)
- Summaries (3 min each)
- Grand Crossfire (3 min)
- Final Focus (2 min each)
ð Judge Tip for You:
Judge on:
- Clarity
- Use of evidence
- Organization
- Persuasiveness
- Respectful questioning
- Strong final focus
After Dinner: Debate Night
- Optional: invite family as audience
- Applause after every speech
- “What argument mattered most?”
- “What question changed the debate?”
- “What would you improve next time?”
ð️ THURSDAY — Individual Speech Events
ð Individual Events Mini-Lessons
Dramatic Interpretation (DI)
- Serious excerpt from a book/play
- Show emotion through voice & movement
- Your goal is to make us feel something.
ð Practice Source
Duo Interpretation (DUO)
- Two performers
- No touching or eye contact
- Use blocking and contrast
Humorous Interpretation (HI)
- Funny but controlled
- Comedy is about timing, not chaos
Impromptu (IMP)
You'll get a topic, take a breath, and organize your thoughts. Everyone messes up in impromptu. That's the point.
ðĐ Pull a topic from a hat:
- “Should homework exist?”
- “Is technology good for kids?”
- “What makes a hero?”
Structure:
- Intro (30 sec)
- Point 1
- Point 2
- Conclusion
Original Oratory (OO)
- 3–5 minutes
- Persuasive speech on a topic they care about
Possible Topics:
- Screen time
- Animal rights
- School rules
- Climate action
- Social media
ð️ FRIDAY — Memorization & Performance Night
Morning
- Memorize OO
- Practice gestures and pauses
Teaching Script: “Memorization frees your brain to connect with the audience.”
Practice tips:
- Chunking
- Speaking while walking
- Speaking without notes for short sections
Evening: Performance Showcase
"Tonight isn’t about perfection. It’s about courage. We clap for effort, growth, and bravery.”
Each child performs:
- Original Oratory
- One interpretation OR impromptu
ðĪ Optional Awards:
- Best Speaker
- Most Improved
- Strongest Argument
- Best Stage Presence
- Speak clearly
- Defend ideas
- Disagree respectfully
- Stand up and be heard
ð️ SATURDAY — Field Trip
- ð️ Toastmasters Youth Event (if available)
- ð️ Courthouse Observation (mock or real)
ð Bonus Resources (Excellent for This Age)
